09-23-2009, 01:49 PM #1
Boost or RPM - Which impacts reliability more?
Is it more reliable to run a bigger SC on a stock ECU or a smaller SC at higher RPMs?
09-23-2009, 01:57 PM #2
theoretically thats pretty simple as anything turning LESS revolutions/ RPM is gonna live longer as its wear factor is LESS and longevity should be increased over and above a higher revolutions/rpm application..........assuming EVERYTHING is the EXACT same and its boost to boost, mod to mod spec to spec other then rpm.....even more boost at less rpm IMO would be safer than less boost at a higher rpm application for the wear factor and longevity overall....PERIOD!!
09-23-2009, 04:13 PM #3
09-23-2009, 05:54 PM #4
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Gonzales, La
Just look at the failures out there. There are lots of dropped valves and some piston damage from rocking at high rpm, but very few broken or melted pistons. Broken and melted pistons are caused by detonation, which comes from high boost. Folks are running 20+ psi without detonation. That's why I chose to stick with 8100 rpm and run 17-18 psi boost with a very tall prop.
There are more failures caused by rpm than boost. Of course, the high boost chargers seem to have compromised clutch life too.
09-23-2009, 06:12 PM #5
09-23-2009, 06:19 PM #6
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
There have been posts before from some very respectable members... 8500 RPM or higher and/or 15psi of boost or more and you start to run into some issues. Like engineermike said, piston rock is one of them.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By thompsdw in forum Sea Doo Open DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 11-16-2007, 03:11 PM
By VX1 in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 6Last Post: 07-09-2007, 03:16 PM
By JFizzleJR in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 10Last Post: 06-23-2007, 10:27 PM
By 06viperrxp in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 4Last Post: 05-08-2007, 08:45 PM
By gnalikalotamonky in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 11Last Post: 01-14-2007, 07:03 PM