11-01-2009, 07:19 AM #1
want to step it up ..turbo or big charger
wanting to step it up ...looking ar a rude 3 ...saw hydrojunkies...missed it.. also saw a turbo ..stainless..housing and all..i build race cars for a living so making a turbo manifold and piping is every day stuff ...
thinking turbo may be cheaper way for me
also saw people on another site talking about et chargers...i am not interested in people bashing them..because jerry sells rude chargers ...
but rather the differences and which ones are comparable in # TO ...RUDE... MINI RUDE... RUDE 2... RUDE 3 .
one was recomending 72 # injectors...that means alot of air...
want to go bigger but .more for acceleration ..and low to mid 80S
than to run 90 or 100 it is a rec ski for the most part..thinking 15 psi at 8100
keeping stock rev limit ..to keep things alive ..
i fully understand the how and why differences on turbo vs super charger...but on a ski it is different than a car ...with direct drive...some of you have ridden both ..thoughts on how they were different to ride...
LOOKING FOR OMG ACCELERATION W A TOP END OF 80 TO 85 AND RIDE ALL SEASON..
11-01-2009, 07:48 AM #2
11-01-2009, 10:19 AM #3
with the 3 rude you can get in the 80 mph + zone on a stock ecu,that's not bad imo.
Easier then the turbo setup for sure.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By philip_gpr in forum Yamaha How To & FAQsReplies: 24Last Post: 07-30-2011, 08:10 AM
By RUNWME in forum High Performance Watercraft SafetyReplies: 17Last Post: 10-16-2008, 10:00 PM
By jerseyshore in forum Sea Doo Open DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 11-13-2007, 11:09 AM
By TorquePhoto in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 30Last Post: 06-26-2007, 10:46 PM
By sauser676 in forum Sea Doo Sport BoatsReplies: 3Last Post: 04-12-2007, 07:01 AM