01-23-2010, 09:51 AM #1
How to put this?
I'm 40ish so 15-20 years ago i had a few bikes like a gsxr and a ninj
So I got this brandnew sho waverunner( still havent tryed it)
I just dont understand this
All the post I read you can only rev it up to 7000-8000 then you have to spend alot of money to reflash the computer etc
The sho engine is a 4 cylinder engine just like a bike
A bike engine can go to 12-14000 rpm without any worrys about the engine blowing up so why is the waverunner set so low in rpms?
I guess bike engines are better?
Thanks still trying to figure this out and cant wait till spring till I get to play
01-23-2010, 02:58 PM #2
I think it is because the ski has to work harder to move because there is more resistance on water than on land with a bike. The sho engine puts out plenty of power so don't let the rpm numbers fool you.
01-23-2010, 03:07 PM #3
I understand about the resistance of the water but the engine doesnt know that
Why is everyone spending lots of money on the valve train and ecm so they can get higher revs
I'm not saying I will not be happy with the sho
The bike engine seems like they are better built and cost slighty less or the same
01-23-2010, 04:28 PM #4
The R1 will go to over 14000rpm if memory serves me correctly, but the MR1 will go to a shade over 10000rpm.
The R1 will rarely be WOT for very long, where as a motor in a pwc spends alot of it's time at the top of it's rpm range, so keeping the revs down ensures decent motor life.
I consistently do WOT runs of around 20 mins.........a bike motor just wouldn't get this kind of punishment
Also.....the SHO uses a 1.8 motor.........much larger then most bikes, so there is no need to use high rpm's
01-24-2010, 01:22 PM #5
I bet it has a lot to do with the pump's design for efficiency as well. The 10,000 RPM MR1 motor has a gear reducer as well to bring the RPMs down before it gets to the pump.
But like volttex said longevity is the main issue. At 10,000 RPM that's 333 strokes a second! You'll probably have around 75% of your skis hours at WOT
Almost a million strokes an hour
01-24-2010, 01:38 PM #6
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- near Toronto, Canada
10,000RPM = 175 revolutions per second
3600 seconds in an hour => 167 * 3600 = 600,000 revs per hour
(same as 10,000RPM * 60 minutes)
4 cylinders * 600,000 revolutions each per hour = 2,400,000 * 2 strokes per rev => 4,800,000 strokes per hour across the four cylinders
01-24-2010, 02:58 PM #7
10,000 revolutions/minute times 2 strokes/revolution times 60 minutes/hr
equals 1,200,000 but I said 75% of the time was WOT. 75% of 1,200,000 is 900,000. To make up for the time it wasn't WOT, I estimated it to be around a million
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By bj25430 in forum 2-Stroke PerformanceReplies: 2Last Post: 07-13-2007, 12:11 PM
By HoopsRXT in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 2Last Post: 09-16-2006, 09:02 AM
By DeeGee in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 7Last Post: 06-15-2006, 04:35 PM
By ramnj in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 11Last Post: 05-29-2006, 09:11 PM
By black beast in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)Replies: 2Last Post: 02-04-2006, 08:40 AM