05-13-2010, 04:01 PM #1
Back to back Rude 3 Vs. Et 70-145
Any body ever done a back to back test of these two chargers?
05-13-2010, 04:05 PM #2
05-13-2010, 04:09 PM #3
05-13-2010, 04:13 PM #4
You can't do back to back, that's not fair
cuz 3RUDE impeller is 141or 142 I cant remember and the ET 70-145 impeller is 145
So just calculated, the deferent is huge
BTW I love your avatar
05-13-2010, 04:23 PM #5
05-13-2010, 04:28 PM #6
the rude 3 you can run pump gas the et 145 you need race fuel...it is simply a bigger charger...and i dont want to reun race fuel these thing use to much of it....
i am very happy with my rude 3..
05-13-2010, 05:25 PM #7
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
neither are plug and play, both need to be set up properly to work, so back to back would show nothing.
05-13-2010, 05:37 PM #8
can anyone at least give their findings? boost at 8100 and at 8600 and even 9000. it's very interesting at least to me because they are the same price
05-13-2010, 05:44 PM #9
Boost wise for my Rude 3 was 14.5 on the stock ECU and 82+ MPH. Added Riva ecu and a few other goods and now see 16 PSI at 8600 and a best of 86.5 MPH. I dont have it setup for top speed though as i did with the stock ecu setup. Im diggin the hole shot with current setup. If I set everything up for speed id be 87 +
05-13-2010, 07:45 PM #10
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By bttek1 in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 6Last Post: 07-27-2007, 07:47 AM
By jahkneefive in forum 2-Stroke PerformanceReplies: 0Last Post: 07-17-2007, 09:09 AM
By great lakes gpr 1200 in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)Replies: 21Last Post: 05-20-2007, 08:03 PM
By tgstk in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 4Last Post: 09-28-2005, 02:29 PM
By Burnwater in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 11Last Post: 08-05-2005, 01:57 PM