Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Site Admin Green Hulk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Morgan City, LA
    Posts
    36,378
    +1
    2,512

    I just tested my stock ECU with the 15/20

    With RR ECU and 15/20 top RPM's of 8000 with flahes of 8050 at a speed of 72.0 mph

    With stock ECU and 15/20 top RPM's of 8000 and a top speed of 72.1
    The acceleration seemed to be a tad bit better. I guess because it is leaner with this ECU.


  2. #2
    YudLuz2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Flowood MS
    Posts
    1,644
    +1
    109
    Jerry, Did you think about this prop works best with the stock venturi
    nozzle? I haven't read a lot about your setup, but I think your said you were running a smaller venturi at one time. Since Riva doesn't sell a Venturi it was probably only tested with there mods with the stock
    pump parts. Just something to consider. Ben

  3. #3
    PAINKILLER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Marion, Ohio
    Posts
    277
    hulk what rpms were u turning before? what impeller/pitch? top speed? is the rr computer worth the $$money$$?

  4. #4
    Jarrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Waxahachie, TX
    Posts
    3,011
    +1
    77
    Guess the magic is in the IC then?

  5. #5
    Jerry..........
    With the RPM's you are turning,the speeds,and,a taller/steeper prop, ya think it MIGHT be possible that you guys are are outflowing the intake area,not so much of the pump,but the intake area itself? You think it MAY be possible that IT is becoming a restriction? I know you are running a grate,but............I wonder what would happen if you could enlarge the inlet area a bit, to allow more water to the pump itself. It stands to reason,that if the engine doesn't have to use as much of it's horsepower sucking the water IN, it has MORE available to use on the BLOW side

    Things that make you go "hmmmmmmmmm"

  6. #6
    Site Admin Green Hulk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Morgan City, LA
    Posts
    36,378
    +1
    2,512
    Ben, i ran it today with my stock venturi.

    painkiller, my RPM's before were 8400-8450 with a repitched Solas 14/19.5.

  7. #7
    Site Admin Green Hulk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Morgan City, LA
    Posts
    36,378
    +1
    2,512
    SKR8PN, i have often thought about this very issue, but i don't have the guts to modify this part of my hull.

    It's a damn good theory though. If someone wants to donate me a hull I will definately try it

  8. #8
    Site Admin Green Hulk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Morgan City, LA
    Posts
    36,378
    +1
    2,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett
    Guess the magic is in the IC then?
    I want to try one!

  9. #9
    David 1 FAST VE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southaven, MS
    Posts
    1,958
    +1
    1
    It looks like in the Pics that the RIVA IC has a shorter intake track, maybe all we need is a new mounting bracket and new IC piping to move the RR IC forward and shorten the distance between the IC and motor???

    As far as overflowing the intake area, I think more intake grate could flow all the water possible, but the pump could use some help.

    I know when Scat finishes their pump I will be trying one. Scat's GP said they will have some results in a month or so.

  10. #10
    EZ Dock of Long Island Shibby1485's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    9,464
    +1
    3
    what we need is a light weight I/O motor with hydraulic trim with dual counter-rotating props like a mercruiser Bravo 3 .... imagine that kinda power in a little 10 foot PWC? but the block and outdrive would sink the ski....

    i TOO also think that the pump / intake grate setup is restricting us, but it's a TON of R&D to come up with something different. I feel like the water isn't flowing thru the intake grate at a fast enough rate for the impeller and motor.... but i guess if that was the case we'd be cavitating and hitting the rev limiter... which means it's getting exactly enuff water flow thru the intake?

    defintiely a VERY interest concept to think about, but all the times i've pondered it, i can't come up with any alternatives in my wildest dreams that would rationally be feasible.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. just a follow up from my previous problem with the driveshaft
    By TanTeckSang in forum 4-Tec Performance
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-20-2015, 11:34 PM
  2. Stock nozzle ? with Solas 15/20 & ET127,42 inj & exic ?
    By kensmith in forum 4-Tec Performance
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-30-2015, 12:50 PM
  3. FS - Parts Stock ECU for the Ultra 300 with programmed Full power key
    By jetdave56 in forum Kawasaki Classifieds
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-09-2014, 09:54 PM
  4. just tested my vf3 reeds from fernando
    By txgp1300r in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-18-2006, 08:52 AM
  5. Update on my paperwork problem with the Ski
    By Pettee in forum Sea Doo Open Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-19-2006, 04:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •