01-04-2011, 11:10 PM #1
What is faster... 2011: RXPX or FZR?
Not interested in starting flame..about time to get another ski!
01-04-2011, 11:32 PM #2
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Discovery Bay, CA
01-04-2011, 11:37 PM #3
01-04-2011, 11:41 PM #4
Both completely stock. Holeshot i think goes to the rxp-x and as far as mph i've seen 69's mph on fzr as far as mph on thr rxp-x dont know. Do you plan on keeping it stock or modify?
01-04-2011, 11:46 PM #5
if bone stock, the rxpx is faster
01-04-2011, 11:53 PM #6
100% stock minus ride plate holes filled my 215 RXP ran 70.9mph on GPS
01-04-2011, 11:53 PM #7
01-04-2011, 11:56 PM #8
01-05-2011, 12:26 AM #9
Depends on how fast the vehicle is towing the trailer.
Nobody beats Sea-Doo's stock hole shot.
Beyond that, I think it depends on the ski and how well the rider uses the trim. One of our FZ's was running well over 70 mph bone stock. I think the other one was only doing 67 mph. That's a big difference out of the box.
In the world of stock watercraft, I have found that a lot of weekend riders don't really use their trim properly. In the chop, properly trimmed I think the FZ will challenge any stock RXP-X. I also tested the FZ side by side with the 2010 RXT-X several times, and properly trimmed, the FZ walked all over it.
01-05-2011, 10:39 AM #10
So the FZ's are faster than the RXT-X but slower than the RXP-X ?? Do they have different engines or just really difference hulls and weight ???
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By mlewis in forum Kawasaki How To & FAQsReplies: 111Last Post: 11-12-2015, 04:41 PM
By mstennes in forum 2-Stroke PerformanceReplies: 21Last Post: 08-08-2008, 02:48 PM
By MIARider in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 78Last Post: 07-03-2008, 05:13 PM
By mjp in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)Replies: 10Last Post: 10-13-2006, 03:41 PM
By Denali44 in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 9Last Post: 08-15-2006, 01:52 AM