Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    1997 Polaris 780 SLT sitting low in the water

    I recently bought my ski because my friend has one that is a 96 750 SLT which is a great ski. Upon taking it out I realized that his sits about 3" higher in the back end then mine when no one is on it. When I sit on mine the rear goes down and water comes in where my feet are and then and I come up to a plane it goes out. When I sit on his I do not have water come in. I have looked in the engine area and tere isnt any water in mine. Could the difference be the weight of the 750 compared to the 780? I am clueless as to why the exact same body style would sit at different heights in the water....any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Jim


  2. #2
    She likes the bike. But the ski gets her wet!!!! xlint89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleveland OH
    Posts
    17,330
    +1
    31
    Welcome to the Hulk Jim.

    1. Your buddy has either a 1994 or 95 SLT 750. They went to the SLT 780 in 96.

    2. There are some differences between the 2 hulls since they changed it a bit in 1996 when they added the 780 engine.

    1995 SLT 750:

    L 120.3"
    W 47.3"
    H 37"
    Dry weight 530 lbs.
    Fuel 11 gals


    1996 SLT 780:

    L 120.3"
    W 49.3"
    H 39"
    Dry weight 595 lbs
    Fuel capacity 14.5 gals



    Can't tell you why your SLT 780 sits lower. I have a SLT 750 and never noticed it sitting higher than the SLT 780 I ride with.

    It almost doesn't matter, because the skis aren't meant to be barges. They're meant to ride, and as you said, once you hit the gas, the bow rises and the water runs out of the foot wells.

  3. #3
    BlueFishCrisis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Medina, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    4,988
    +1
    140
    My 94 SLTs nose is down in the water with the back end up with a full tank of gas.........

  4. #4
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Milwaukee WI
    Posts
    16,708
    +1
    1,324
    As long as the inside of the hull is dry I wouldnt worry about it

  5. #5
    johnsonmtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Mt. Zion Illinois
    Posts
    1,250
    +1
    7
    I have both a '94 SLT and a '96SLT. The rub rail of the '94 sets completely out of the water while the rub rail of the '96 sets right at the water line. It's just differences in the design of the hull.

    KJ

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New top end in 1996' 780 SLT with engine in the hull?
    By Todd36 in forum Polaris PWC Performance
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-03-2014, 06:30 PM
  2. waveraider 1100 rides very low in the water
    By alex3610 in forum Yamaha Old School Skis
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-05-2011, 03:12 PM
  3. 1996 Polaris SLX780 is riding low in the water
    By dhart in forum Polaris PWC Performance
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-08-2010, 05:36 PM
  4. 2000 Ultra 150 Sits Low In The Water
    By aviator in forum Kawasaki Open Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-29-2008, 11:55 PM
  5. 1997 Polaris 780 SLT (Cutting out at full throttle)
    By harleyfun1996 in forum Polaris Open Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-24-2008, 01:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •