05-01-2012, 05:42 PM #1
How many folks are rocking a long-blade???
Just curious whos running one. Looking at different things to maybe lessen the cavitation on holeshot. See quite a few praise the long-blade prop so lets hear your input.
05-01-2012, 07:10 PM #2
i bought a long blade but the guy sold me a regular skat I should have sent it back ,, you should ask some of those guys with the 160 pumps or a cone or something ,,they might have a little less cavitation the cavitation does not bother me, the motor is a beast it is strong enough to brake the prop of the hull ,it is a 800 plus pound boat with about 300 hp it may need wheelie bars lol the 300x comes from the factory with 160mm prop on it
P.S. it is a 13/24 stock number 155-75-25
Last edited by mckma; 05-07-2012 at 06:24 PM.
05-01-2012, 08:20 PM #3
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Central North Carolina
FYI 155-75-25 What that means is 155 mm dia prop, 75 mm hub dia, 25 mm shaft size, Those are the deminsions of the prop and does NOT denote standard blade or long blade. Tommy Jordan
05-07-2012, 06:18 PM #4
when my skat prop is sitting on the table the blades touch the table , and also it likes to drink gas
05-07-2012, 07:22 PM #5
I rock the long blades as most already know. I just like the overall feel. Less cavitation, more long range riding efficiency with good peak rpm. I never noticed they use more fuel than standard blades. I made several runs from the small boat harbor, down Niagara River, around Grand Island and back to the small boat harbor in Buffalo,NY with various props. I tried a twin prop, stock prop pitched, 13/21 standard blade and the 13/23 Pro Pirch. I always had the most fuel left in the tank with the 13/23. The 13/21 standard wasn't too bad either. It definately had more cavitation when compared to the long blade and peak rpm was close when comparing the two. My GF's ski was bone stock last year and I usually averaged 2 gallons more fuel in the tank after that run when keeping things in the cruising range (6200-7000rpm). She would have to stand on hers a little harder to keep up and that would cause her to use more fuel to stay on pace as the rpms and boost was higher as she was making considerably less power on her stock unit compared to mine. If you ran WOT, obviously mine would use more than hers but when making more power, you can do more with less and with a more aggressive pitch, more distance per revolution is what makes you faster.
05-07-2012, 09:38 PM #6
05-07-2012, 09:50 PM #7
05-07-2012, 10:43 PM #8
can u post a pic of a long blade just for my own edification?
05-07-2012, 10:48 PM #9
05-08-2012, 05:29 AM #10
so on your pics the long blade is the one on the right and the one on the left is the regular swirl?
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)