Thread: Got an idea
02-17-2007, 12:35 AM #1
Got an idea
I dont know if this has already been tried or if it would benefit but here it is...
My idea is to take out the stock driveshaft that is im guessing 3/4" diameter and replacing with different shaft that reduces down to 1/2" as soon as it comes out of the hull and then goes back to 3/4" at the impellar. I think it would be a good idea to use a stronger metal to prevent it from torque to much ti bends. with it staying 3/4 at each end it will not require any additional mods to make it fit. I am sure it would be an easy project for a machine shop to just copy the stock one except reduce the middle down to 1/2"
Now if it will work, with it being a smaller diameter it will increase the area of the pump tunnel possibly reducing cavitation and increasing top speed maybe? I dont know enough about my ski to do the mods but not really why most of them work so i might be totally wrong on the benefit.
What do you all think?
02-17-2007, 12:38 AM #2
02-17-2007, 12:41 AM #3
what do you meen by premature tunnel stuffing?
I dont know metals real well but im sure their is somethign that is both stronger and lighter so we could maybe shed a couple pounds as well.
Last edited by MDGPR; 02-17-2007 at 12:43 AM.
02-17-2007, 12:46 AM #4
At the higher speeds some are running, 78+, they encounter a problem where the impeller is no longer pulling water....water is getting forced into the tunnel. the term" tunnel stuffing" is what I am referring to.
the end result is the "Buck" some experience as their boats pump area gets overstuffed with water volume form the speed they are running.
If you look back at the Yamaha Superjet, they sell a tunnel stuffer that takes up some pump tunnel area to help the ski increase in speed and lower the amount of water volume that the pump is taking in.
The 800 grate help reduce the amount of water that comes into the pump area via the ramp and scoop angle. the pump area is recieving less water, thus the pump does not get as loaded vs. the 1200 grate.
A larger pump area is probably more beneficial for CC racing where they need all the hook-up they can get.
Yamaha increased the pump volume on the GPRs by adding the 2" pump spacer as seen on the 2003-current GPR's.
Last edited by RX951; 02-17-2007 at 12:51 AM.
02-17-2007, 12:47 AM #5
Is anyone working on something like that for the GPR? I saw the picture for the Superjet.
Last edited by Chrisrokc; 02-17-2007 at 12:52 AM.
02-17-2007, 12:52 AM #6
Last edited by RX951; 02-17-2007 at 12:55 AM.
02-17-2007, 12:53 AM #7
02-17-2007, 12:57 AM #8
Billy is 100% on it.The closed coarse pro shoe allows much more water through and is more streamlined for better flow,but after 75mph not much good.
Now how bout a super jet stuffer modified to fit a GPR ?Inquiring minds wanna know!
Last edited by H204YOU; 02-17-2007 at 01:02 AM.
02-17-2007, 01:06 AM #9
Lol, yea I am still at it. I have been slammed with homework and nothing sounded exciting tonight so I decided to stay in.
Hopefully this weather will get nice and next weekend I can get to work on the ski!
02-17-2007, 02:29 AM #10
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By boostaholic in forum Sea Doo ClassifiedsReplies: 0Last Post: 07-18-2009, 12:42 PM
By spaceman in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)Replies: 9Last Post: 10-03-2008, 04:53 PM
By excess in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 9Last Post: 01-17-2008, 08:47 PM
By FL03GTX in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 12Last Post: 10-28-2007, 08:53 PM
By travelboysteve in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 1Last Post: 08-10-2007, 08:28 AM