Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1

    2012 RXP-X vs 2012 RXT-X

    Question, how come the Riva Stage Two Performance kit states 74 mph for the RXT-X and only 72mph for the RXP-X? It looks like all the mods are the same, what get's you the extra 2 mph? What am I missing?


  2. #2
    Hull design.....

    Andy

  3. +1 by:


  4. #3
    GRF + DashPac:) seadoo02xp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    4,559
    +1
    948
    px hull is slow, it handles great but its slow as shit........

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by seadoo02xp View Post
    px hull is slow, it handles great but its slow as shit........
    Any way to tweak the hull

  6. #5
    GRF + DashPac:) seadoo02xp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    4,559
    +1
    948
    Quote Originally Posted by rxpx2012 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by seadoo02xp View Post
    px hull is slow, it handles great but its slow as shit........
    Any way to tweak the hull
    I've been working on that with no luck so far. I modded my rideplate dramatically and didn't gain much. I have a jims open loop plate coming soon. There are some out there that are fast. ....troy. ....but for the most part they are slow

  7. #6
    Thanks for the heads up, Have a Great 4th of July

  8. #7
    Water4fire's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Braunfels TX.
    Posts
    10,064
    +1
    790
    It took a huge amount of mods to get my ski over 82mph and with forum members having the same mods on there T-X they got faster speeds than me. I know some think it is because we haven't work on the ski enough or dont know what we are doing, but I can say for sure I went through a bunch of set ups to get my skio to were it is now and the hull design is a bit slower for top speed. Jawz stated I hadnt worked on it enough to know and disagrees with this and he staes the p=x is faster. i dont know about that, but would deffinately love input and proof.

  9. #8
    GRF + DashPac:) seadoo02xp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    4,559
    +1
    948
    Quote Originally Posted by Water4fire View Post
    It took a huge amount of mods to get my ski over 82mph and with forum members having the same mods on there T-X they got faster speeds than me. I know some think it is because we haven't work on the ski enough or dont know what we are doing, but I can say for sure I went through a bunch of set ups to get my skio to were it is now and the hull design is a bit slower for top speed. Jawz stated I hadnt worked on it enough to know and disagrees with this and he staes the p=x is faster. i dont know about that, but would deffinately love input and proof.
    I'm with ya buddy. The hull tears up some chop but glass water top speeds just plain suck for the amount of modding it takes. Your about to swap the motec to the tx aren't ya

  10. #9
    Live Fast wave15stx's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    2,214
    +1
    32
    I noticed a 2mph+gps difference stock at the same rpm between the two rxtx was faster

  11. #10
    Water4fire's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New Braunfels TX.
    Posts
    10,064
    +1
    790
    Quote Originally Posted by seadoo02xp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Water4fire View Post
    It took a huge amount of mods to get my ski over 82mph and with forum members having the same mods on there T-X they got faster speeds than me. I know some think it is because we haven't work on the ski enough or dont know what we are doing, but I can say for sure I went through a bunch of set ups to get my skio to were it is now and the hull design is a bit slower for top speed. Jawz stated I hadnt worked on it enough to know and disagrees with this and he staes the p=x is faster. i dont know about that, but would deffinately love input and proof.
    I'm with ya buddy. The hull tears up some chop but glass water top speeds just plain suck for the amount of modding it takes. Your about to swap the motec to the tx aren't ya
    We are at the lake house now and I will know today. If my P-X doesn't do 84+ all the time then probably.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Seadoo Comparison - 1996 XP vs 2008 RXP-X vs 2010 RXT-X
    By not2fast in forum Sea Doo Open Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-24-2015, 10:08 AM
  2. 2012 RXT-X vs 2012 GTX 155
    By DonHy in forum 4-Tec Performance
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-17-2012, 05:16 AM
  3. 2012 RXT 260 vs RXT-X 260
    By ktm23rash in forum Sea Doo Open Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-02-2012, 08:26 AM
  4. 2012 RXTX vs 2012 RXT why the X?
    By seadoopunk in forum 4-Tec Performance
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-16-2012, 05:10 AM
  5. Intercooler: 2009 RXP-X255 vs 2011 RXT-X260???
    By ZeXteR in forum 4-Tec Performance
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-12-2011, 07:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •