Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Garland, Tx
    Posts
    256
    +1
    12

    Whats your power to Weight / or Thrust to weight ratio?

    Hey dudes, whats up? Im curious.. for some manufacturers, I can find the thrust-to-weight ratio... but mostly, just the power-to-weight ratios..

    Im very curious to see if you guys have figured out yours?

    im so anxious to get my xp out in the water, and one of the reasons, was because I could get the power-to-weight ratio, damn close to the lower end supercharged skis, and base model "performance" new skis..
    im curious about the comparison.. well, besides the difference in newer designs, amenities, and all that stuff..
    running an 03 xp-di, with level one kit, stock impeller, everything else is stock.

    dry weight is 562 lbs..
    14 gallons fuel is 84 lbs,
    rider is 230 lbs,
    so im ending up with ~870-890 total lbs, with fluids, gear, rider, etc.. on an 8 foot ski, with about 147-150 hp..


  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Annapolis MD
    Posts
    32
    +1
    2
    Hey Jetman150, Using you numbers, I show you at a impressive value of 5.56 based on my thread below. Total weight divided by hp. That is about the same as a 07 Yam GP1300R. Why aren't more people talking about this? Where did you get your stage 1 kit? I bet your XP DI is a blast to ride.

    http://www.greenhulk.net/forums/showthread.php?t=207395

    Note: Seadoo spec book shows your dry weight at 625 which would bring you up to a 6.0
    Last edited by Bible Fan; 09-28-2013 at 09:44 PM.

  3. #3
    SplishSplash's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Belle River Ont Canada
    Posts
    1,181
    +1
    98
    Power to weight does not mean much on a water craft. Thrust is what matters. You could have all the power in the world, but if the pump design is poor, cavitation, etc,you waste a lot of it.

    Today's ski's lots of them have a thrust to weight ratio of 1-1 or better. Also it depends on how the mfg reports their thrust, if its static in a testbed, or moving on the water. On the water nets a higher thrust due to the ram effect.

    This is why the old 2 strokes like a kawi ultra 150 were so much fun, they weighed around 650 lbs but had thrust over 700 lbs. Made for a light nimble fast ski. XP is another. Thus the reason the Spark might be fun, it better have a good pump thrust, cause it has only 1/2 the power of the old 2 strokes.

    Now todays big heavy machines, your close to 1000 lbs or more in weight, thrust about the same. More thrust for sure, but more to push around.

  4. #4
    ride it like you stole it!!! raceneked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Lake Havasu, AZ
    Posts
    3,021
    +1
    840
    2012 GTR

    850lb.(w/full fuel)/215= 3.953lbs/hp
    760lb./215= 3.534lbs/hp

    I have no idea what the pump thrust is...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-08-2013, 09:13 PM
  2. What did you to do/with your Yamaha today??
    By Cutlass in forum Yamaha Open Discussion
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 05-21-2013, 08:38 PM
  3. Whats your go to top water rod and reel?
    By Newcastle in forum PWC Fishing
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-30-2012, 11:39 AM
  4. what is needed to put a 1300 or 1200 in a 02 gp800r
    By pulser9 in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-09-2010, 12:16 AM
  5. What actually SENDS power to the battery to charge??
    By BartenderSmalley in forum Sea Doo Open Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-28-2008, 11:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •