Thread: I worry about this video
12-09-2014, 01:23 PM #1
I worry about this video
It really is faster Yamaha SVHO than the RXT 260?
12-09-2014, 02:35 PM #2
12-09-2014, 02:40 PM #3
They should be about the same, stock vs stock. The difference comes from different riders.
12-09-2014, 03:15 PM #4
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
RXT has more fuel in tank. Also it took Yamaha an additonal 300cc+ to equal the horse power.
12-09-2014, 03:19 PM #5
what you say is correct, but Yamaha is usually more stable than sea doo, but fuel consumption is higher than in sea doo Yamaha.
Perhaps the only downside of sea doo is to go really fast the water has to be smooth.
12-09-2014, 03:46 PM #6
12-09-2014, 03:56 PM #7
With 2 people on the T3, it is a chore in even a ripple keeping it in the water. It cavitates constantly and you have to constantly adjust. With one person, move your weight back a little bit and wow, it just stays planted.
12-09-2014, 04:27 PM #8
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/8J6wKXRWMWg?list=UUx2Uoz0ZuFONBtYt_SLcWcA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
my friends Yesterday FZR svho completly stock 20 hours,rxpx free exhaust but all stock 82 hours
12-09-2014, 04:31 PM #9
*ALPAGO* HYDRODRAG on you tube my friends yesterday
12-09-2014, 04:43 PM #10
Alan, interesting video
The svho best out of the hole, but then the sea doo recovers and exceeds the svho with solvency ..... good contribution.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By vincent vega in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)Replies: 1Last Post: 02-14-2014, 03:47 PM
By Speed_Freak_039A in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 0Last Post: 10-06-2009, 04:12 PM
By Drunken Sailor in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 6Last Post: 09-27-2007, 01:58 PM
By rxp_boy in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 3Last Post: 08-01-2005, 07:23 PM
By djburkeen in forum Sea Doo Open DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 06-03-2005, 08:54 PM