Thread: question for the RXT drivers
12-24-2007, 11:43 AM #1
question for the RXT drivers
Any of you run without opas and bo's?
12-24-2007, 12:08 PM #2
I had RE Blockoffs installed but decided to sell them to get a new prop so I installed the cheap riva hole covers and could not tell a difference in handling. I did install skegs, though. ATC2006 runs without skegs or block offs and I cannot tell any handling difference.
12-24-2007, 12:42 PM #3
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
i had the cheap blockoffs first the went to the re blockoffs big difference when running 2-3 foot chop boat feels more stable with the opas felt dangerous running in wot in chop one wrong turn on the handle at wot would throw off rider
12-24-2007, 12:54 PM #4
12-24-2007, 01:08 PM #5
it all depends how fast you plan on making it go....i had the cheap covers that came with the pirahna ic kit installed untill my re's came in.... as soon as my ski hit 72mph it started to porpoise really bad, but stopped once i put the re's on ....they are a must have for highly modified RXT's....just my $.02
12-24-2007, 02:28 PM #6
I purchased the RE block-offs after all the thread reading on this site. I am very impressed with their build quality.
My RXT-X is due in early next year, February from what I'm hearing at the moment, at which time I plan on installing the RE's, getting her broken in correctly and then doing some proven speed modifications after that.
I would like to hit 75 plus. Just anxious to see what these aftermarket tuners have for it. Later, Jon
12-24-2007, 02:59 PM #7
Thanks for all the replies.
A coupla more questions though...
Lafjax, no porpoising at 73+...due to the skegs?...act2006 doesn't run skegs...is his ski as fast? Does his ski "track" as well as yours in the rough?
Rocko672, you had porposing going on at 72...did you have skegs at the time? Was this porposing going on at wot in the rough?
Just curious...I hate working backwards is all...especially if it involves cutting into my hull.
Last question....in the rough...everybody prefers no opas...even without bo's?
12-24-2007, 03:08 PM #8
no skeggs at the time and i was running on glass....i might have been going 73mph but i cant remember ..... but as soon as i put the re's on it, it stopped and then i upgraded everything and have been good all the way to 78 and hopefully will be good to 83+
12-24-2007, 04:42 PM #9
12-24-2007, 05:49 PM #10
Get the OPAS off...
for me(in order):
OPAS=unpredictable handling at speed.
Standard B/Os=better handling/more predictable
As I started going faster=porposing at around 72 mph
Added Skegs= helped a little with ole Bouncybounce, but aided handling
Added REs= Eliminated Bouncybounce, I'm still amazed what two little overpriced pieces of aluminum will do.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By hdsilverado in forum Sea Doo Open DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 04-06-2008, 09:18 AM
By SKR8PN in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 15Last Post: 07-03-2005, 06:48 PM
By SKR8PN in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 2Last Post: 06-24-2005, 05:21 PM
By BertInTexas in forum Sea Doo Open DiscussionReplies: 11Last Post: 06-14-2005, 04:24 AM
By Therock in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 3Last Post: 05-20-2005, 07:13 AM