Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1
    SideFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    BC Interior
    Posts
    988
    +1
    5

    Question feedback on new RXPX decal designs

    Found a bit of alone time tonight to work on a much requested RXPX decal.
    Not sure how to rank them on a scale of appearance/popularity go, so your feedback is welcomed

    Th^nk you.
    Peter
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SAMPLER.jpg 
Views:	80 
Size:	585.1 KB 
ID:	70833  


  2. #2
    Last one with a bee.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by SideFX View Post
    Found a bit of alone time tonight to work on a much requested RXPX decal.
    Not sure how to rank them on a scale of appearance/popularity go, so your feedback is welcomed

    Th^nk you.
    Peter
    Last one with the Bee, try to make the "RXP" (letters in black) and the "X" (letter) in yellow. shade the backround in "Green Hulk green" inside the "supperman" look alike chest insignia(spell check)...... leave the bee alone
    Last edited by Jammer 1; 05-03-2008 at 04:40 AM.

  4. #4
    SideFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    BC Interior
    Posts
    988
    +1
    5
    Well, I tried your first idea, well, first .)

    Off to zzzleep now.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jammer 1 View Post
    Last one with the Bee, try to make the "RXP" (letters in black) and the "X" (letter) in yellow. shade the backround in "Green Hulk green" inside the "supperman" look alike chest insignia(spell check)...... leave the bee alone
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SUPER WASP v2S.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	257.6 KB 
ID:	70834  

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by SideFX View Post
    Well, I tried your first idea, well, first .)

    Off to zzzleep now.
    AWESOME! Thanks, I'll get back to ya. looks good. That Bee looks wicked. I like this thread. we need some Green Hulk Green

  6. #6
    Faster Than a Snail on a Log mongorunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North of Amarillo TX
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by SideFX View Post
    Well, I tried your first idea, well, first .)

    Off to zzzleep now.

    lol that one looks good, how bout not making the text curved but more on a straightline?

    maybe the RXP a different font size than the X

  7. #7
    SideFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    BC Interior
    Posts
    988
    +1
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by mongorunner View Post
    lol that one looks good, how bout not making the text curved but more on a straightline?

    maybe the RXP a different font size than the X
    The curvature at 22.783 degrees (crown up) is necessary in the overall font design/layout whereby force amplification by visual perspective on the zero degree from the level of T P W to the angle S P W is actually near the zenith point.

    However....and per say we were to change the overall radius and stress the text would cause a major impedance in the arching of the background thereby creating the illusion that temporal latitude of said design would be negative flow = processed much differently by the visual cortex.

    Not to say that it is an impossibility, though one must realize that there are universal rules to which must be adhered by when playing with the geometry.
    At worst, this could cause a discrepatatory shift thus placing too much force on said cortex.

    All in all, the conclusion would be to to drop hew by 0.0005 megampules
    (pronounced: mega-ampules) lets say 0.0039 which would do the job quite efficiently.
    There are no other cohesives in the formula.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Corpus Christi, Tx
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by SideFX View Post
    The curvature at 22.783 degrees (crown up) is necessary in the overall font design/layout whereby force amplification by visual perspective on the zero degree from the level of T P W to the angle S P W is actually near the zenith point.

    However....and per say we were to change the overall radius and stress the text would cause a major impedance in the arching of the background thereby creating the illusion that temporal latitude of said design would be negative flow = processed much differently by the visual cortex.

    Not to say that it is an impossibility, though one must realize that there are universal rules to which must be adhered by when playing with the geometry.
    At worst, this could cause a discrepatatory shift thus placing too much force on said cortex.

    All in all, the conclusion would be to to drop hew by 0.0005 megampules
    (pronounced: mega-ampules) lets say 0.0039 which would do the job quite efficiently.
    There are no other cohesives in the formula.

    GOOD ONE!! Like Jammer, I think the bee looks great.

  9. #9
    Faster Than a Snail on a Log mongorunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North of Amarillo TX
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by SideFX View Post
    The curvature at 22.783 degrees (crown up) is necessary in the overall font design/layout whereby force amplification by visual perspective on the zero degree from the level of T P W to the angle S P W is actually near the zenith point.

    However....and per say we were to change the overall radius and stress the text would cause a major impedance in the arching of the background thereby creating the illusion that temporal latitude of said design would be negative flow = processed much differently by the visual cortex.

    Not to say that it is an impossibility, though one must realize that there are universal rules to which must be adhered by when playing with the geometry.
    At worst, this could cause a discrepatatory shift thus placing too much force on said cortex.

    All in all, the conclusion would be to to drop hew by 0.0005 megampules
    (pronounced: mega-ampules) lets say 0.0039 which would do the job quite efficiently.
    There are no other cohesives in the formula.


  10. #10
    SideFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    BC Interior
    Posts
    988
    +1
    5
    LoL!!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Top Speed on New 2014 RXPX & RXTX
    By joe w in forum 4-Tec Performance
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 10-17-2014, 08:26 PM
  2. 2 questions on new purchase of 2003 FX140...Oil and decals
    By gregpwc in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (4-stroke)
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-12-2012, 04:30 PM
  3. New Member: 2011 Yamaha FZR - Need Feedback on Mods!
    By GreenFZR in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (4-stroke)
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-27-2011, 06:00 PM
  4. need new feedback on C-Kit
    By FreakRXP1200 in forum 4-Tec Performance
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 02-03-2009, 09:43 AM
  5. key setting problems on new rxpx
    By davidescu_radu in forum 4-Tec Performance
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-09-2008, 01:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •