06-28-2006, 04:24 AM #1
OK, we always hear "comparing apples to apples" which got me to thinking, what exactly in your mind constitutes "apples to apples"?
Is it overall engine size?
Is it overall HP?
Is it overall money spent on entire machine?
Is it overall money spent just on added mods?
Is it NA vs. NA motors and Boosted motors vs. Boosted motors?
I have my ideas, but I want to hear yours.
I only ask because I've been thinking that it would be nice to know where everybody's heads are at with this subject.
What got me to thinking about this was a scenario something like this in my mind....
Guy A buys a used GPR for cheap money. Spends exactly what it takes to make it run 70mph dead even. We'll say he got a deal, boat has high hours and he picked it up for $3500. Say he spends $1500 more on mods and settles in at 70mph dead even. Total investment $5000.
Guy B buys a brand new RXP that hits 70 dead even right out of the box for $11,000. Total investment $11,000.
Boats are running exactly the same speed over and over, race after race.
So there you have it.
One machine is older, one is brand new.
One machine is modded, one was delivered from factory as is.
One machine has more CC's than the other.
One machine is NA, one is Boosted.
One machine is assumed to have more HP.
One machine cost a lot more than the other. (overall)
Both machines are running dead even with each other.
In the above scenario, are we "comparing apples to apples," and more importantly, why or why aren't we?
Again, I have my twisted opinion all figured out in my head, but I want to hear yours first!!!
Thanks guys and enjoy the day!!!
Last edited by CrazyA; 06-28-2006 at 05:33 AM.
06-28-2006, 02:38 PM #2Originally Posted by CrazyA
Apples to apples means to me that the models are the same, the mods are the same and the race conditions are the same.
Just because the end result is that they run the same speed, does not constitute an apples to apples comparison.
It would be like saying
Has a 05' RXP with a very badly running 25,000 HP F-15 rocket motor in it, and it tops out at 70 mph
Has a 05' RXP with a good running stock motor that tops out at 70 mph.
The end result is the same, sure......... But the technology used to get there is very different.
06-28-2006, 03:59 PM #3
06-28-2006, 09:14 PM #4
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Rydal, Georgia U S A
Apples for apples, I'll take the Rxp across lake Superior and let some one else take the OTHER ski, We'll see who gets there first... or who makes the trip
06-30-2006, 12:40 PM #5
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
Apples are like Women
They come in all different shapes and sizes and colours,
They all taste a little different,
They're all good for you,
They are better when not blemished,
They need sunshine are care,
They keep the Doctor away,
They are worthy of respect because they out number us,
And, most importantly having to do with PWC, everybody has they're fav. flavour so comparing them will only cause you heartach and grief.
Eat what's in front of you.
Ride what's in your driveway.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By vintageboater in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)Replies: 7Last Post: 07-31-2012, 08:44 PM
By vintageboater in forum Yamaha Old School SkisReplies: 1Last Post: 07-25-2012, 09:57 AM
By Rocky_Road in forum MSX/MatrixReplies: 11Last Post: 05-24-2008, 11:23 AM