Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    pros N cons 110s vs merc

    looking at the 98-2002 speedters with bothe the twin 110s or the merc single 240. I have heard that the merc is hard on fuel.
    As far as performance/fuel and reliability, which is a better way to go?


  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Romeo, Michigan
    Posts
    14
    I have had both an 02 and 04 with the merc...and have raced a 98 speedster and pulled on him...and really arent restricted by anything as far as power...as for fuel consumption....its all about what you compare it to...i didnt think that it was efficient untill i got my 2 p-x's.

  3. #3
    Heard that the mercs were more expensive to fix. I will be using the boat a lot for pulling tubes/ski/wake/kneeboards and several at a time. Does the merc come out of the hole with a full load just as good. There are a lot more of them around for sale than the twin motors which is why I am considering one.

  4. #4
    seadoodude's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    83
    i have the 20 ft Challenger 2000 with the Merc 240 M2 Jet. Hole shot is great even on this large boat and fully loaded with 8 people and 40 gallons of gas. I was very impressed. We use it to pull tubes and skis, no problems other than the jet wash. I had to add a little more rope when pulling tubers. The Merc Jet does not have nozzle trim so there is no way to reduce the jet wash. The SeaDoo Jet pumps do and jet wash can be minimized.

    Personally, I would stay away from those older rotary valve 2 stroke Rotax jet ski engines. Two is double trouble and twice the maintenance. I have two SeaDoo PWCs with the larger 130 hp 951 engine. Reliable but a lot of maintenance. I understand that the Mercury outboard engines are very reliable and easy on maintenance.

    The 2 strokes are going to burn the fuel no doubt but I have not done a comparison to my friends 4 stroke conventional prop boat to say either way.

    this thread has a pretty good write up from WAPWC on the Merc. http://www.pwctoday.com/showthread.php?t=168360
    Last edited by seadoodude; 06-18-2008 at 11:40 PM.

  5. #5

    Pros and cons

    The Mercs burn more fuel, but are quieter. The Rotax pull just as hard,
    straighter, burning less fuel. The Merc will be quieter,and more tolerant of
    crappy maint but will cost hard when it breaks. The Rotax is cheaper to fix
    but louder. Unless owned by a fanatic, the Rotax will need to be rebuilt, bank
    on that. But once up to snuff and taken care off, really reliable. At this point, there are more Merc boats out there. Any thing you get, go through the fuel systems completely. Save you huge money down the line. Good Luck!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. '12 Kawasaki 300X vs '13 Sea Doo RXT 260 - pros and cons - suggestions welcome
    By boostedgta in forum Kawasaki PWC Performance (4-stroke)
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 05-25-2014, 10:00 PM
  2. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 05-24-2014, 08:12 PM
  3. Pros and cons of the 90 hp Spark vs 110 hp '97 SPX (X4 hull).
    By Midwestrider in forum Sea Doo Spark
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-31-2014, 06:00 PM
  4. Stock vs Mods - Pros and Cons
    By brittrich in forum Sea Doo Open Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-23-2012, 10:40 AM
  5. rxp vs rxpx pros and cons.
    By jamiej in forum 4-Tec Performance
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-08-2007, 02:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •