09-22-2008, 12:53 AM #1
The Link Between Breast Cancer and Bras
Or read from this:
A PINCH OF CANCER
The Link Between Bras And Breast Cancer
By William Thomas
If you didn't burn yours in the 'Sixties, you might want to put it away now. "Bras cause breast cancer. It's open and shut," says medical researcher Syd Singer.The Singers became breast cancer sleuths in 1991. On the day Soma discovered a lump in her breast, the husband-wife team was studying the effects of Western medicine on Fijians. In the shower, Syd noticed that Soma's shoulders and breasts were outlined by dark red grooves. He remembered a puzzled Fijian woman asking his wife about her brassiere: "Doesn't it feel tight?""You get used to it," Soma had replied.Could bras be constricting breast tissue, Syd wondered, hampering lymph drainage and causing degeneration?Soma decided to stop wearing hers. But when Syd searched the medical literature he found no known causes of breast cancer, which rarely appears before a woman's mid- thirties, most often after 40. The highest death rates from breast cancer are in North America and northern Europe, with the developing world catching up fast.The World Health Organization calls chemical toxins the primary cause of cancer. But poisons accumulating in breast tissue are normally flushed by clear lymph fluid into large clusters of lymph nodes nestling in the armpits and upper chest. The Singers found that "because lymphatic vessels are very thin, they are extremely sensitive to pressure and are easily compressed." Chronic minimal pressure on the breasts can cause lymph valves and vessels to close."Less oxygen and fewer nutrients are delivered to the cells, while waste products are not flushed away," the Singers noted. After 15 or 20 years of bra-constricted lymph drainage, cancer can result.Looking at other cultures, Soma and Syd were struck by the low incidence of breast cancer in poorer nations awash in pesticides dumped by northern nations. They didn't find peasant women wearing push-up bras. Instead, they discovered that the Maoris of New Zealand integrated into white culture have the same rate of breast cancer, while Australia's marginalized aboriginals have virtually no breast cancer. The same trend held for "Westernized" Japanese, Fijians and other bra-converted cultures.in Dressed To Kill: The Link Between Breast Cancer and Bras, the researchers also observed that just before a woman begins her period, estrogen floods her system, causing her breasts to swell. If she continues wearing the same bra size, life-saving lymphatics will be even more tightly squished. Had they found the "estrogen link" to breast cancer?Childless women never fully develop their breast-cleansing lymphatic system. Nor do women who have never breast-fed. Working women who wear bras everyday and postpone having children could be at higher risk, the Singers warn.Even worse, a young woman's coming of age is often "marked" by her first bra. Like the ancient Chinese practice of foot-binding, "breast-binding" at puberty can eventually lead to severe medical complications.
eprinted from Alt Health by William Thomas
Could bras be the "missing link" in a growing epidemic of breast cancer? Beginning in May, 1991, Soma and Syd Singer's 30-month Bra and Breast Cancer study interviewed some 4,000 women in five major U.S. cities. All were Caucasian of mostly "medium income" ranging in age from 30 to 79. Half had been diagnosed with breast cancer.
Almost all of the women interviewed were unhappy with the size or shape of their breasts. Women who chose a bra for appearance, ignoring soreness and swelling, had twice the rate of breast cancer of those who did not.
But the most startling statistic was how many women who wore their daytime bras to sleep contracted breast cancer. So did one out seven women strapped into a bra more than 12 hours a day. Bra-free women have just a one in 168 chance of being diagnosed with breast cancer, says Singer. The same as bra-free men.
"Don't sleep in your bra!" Syd Singer pleads. "Women who want to avoid breast cancer should wear a bra for the shortest period of time possible - certainly for less than 12 hours daily."
Syd also submits that some 80% of bra-wearers who experience lumps, cysts and tenderness will see those symptoms vanish, "within a month of getting rid of the bra."
Not everyone is ready to hang up her halter. As one woman told the team, "My tits will sag all the way to my navel without a bra." But Surgeon Christine Haycock at the New Jersey College of Medicine says that inherited traits - not ligaments or breast size - are the reason some breasts give in to gravity. Bouncing bosoms help clear the lymphatics.
Well aware that their findings were "explosive," the Singers sent their survey results to the heads of America's most prestigious cancer organizations and institutes. None responded. Like the cancer business, the bra business is huge. Multiply how many worldwide women buy several $25 bras every year and you end up with a multiple of the $6 billion-a-year U.S. bra business.
Syd Singer says that establishment censorship of the bra-breast cancer connection is killing women. Pointing to the biggest commonality among breast cancer patients, he's emphatic that it's bra-squeezed lymphatics.
Going bra-less for all occasions, Soma began dressing to de-emphasize her breasts. She also began regular breast massage and bicycle riding, vitamin and herbal supplementation, and drinking only purified water.
Two months later, her lump disappeared.
At the first frightening sign of a lump, an angry Syd Singer says, "women should take their bras off before they take their breasts off." Why wait, when you can liberate your lymphatics now?
IF YOU MUST WEAR A BRA
Push-up and sports bras are out. Choose loose-fitting cotton bras. Make sure you can slip two fingers under the shoulder-straps and side- panels. The higher the side-panels, the more severe the restriction of major lymph nodes. Don't wear this disastrous device to sleep. Take it off at home. Massage your breasts every time you remove your bra. Sing your lymphatics into health - or at least breathe deeply.
09-22-2008, 12:56 AM #2
My thought on this is if it were true most women would have breast cancer because most women wear bras. Is my thought process wrong?
09-22-2008, 01:01 AM #3
which rarely appears before a woman's mid- thirties, most often after 40. If you read the article, it would depend on the tightness and such. I would imagine everyone likes a different fit and feel. A personal choice. If men wear tight pants, does it cause a lower sperm count? Yes.
09-22-2008, 09:37 AM #4"Bouncing bosoms help clear the lymphatics."
"Sing your lymphatics into health..."
09-22-2008, 11:35 PM #5
I worked at a TV station that did this story as a "Sweeps" story ten years ago. The medical proof is sketchy at best, the series was blasted by the public and doctors alike .
09-22-2008, 11:37 PM #6
I remember that hub-bub some years back... but it definately has been gaining traction over the years, as the same ones that were poo-poo'ing it, STILL have no clue as to why the rates are skyrocketting.
Who really knows at this point..
09-23-2008, 12:16 AM #7
Growth hormones in chicken and global warming
09-24-2008, 04:54 PM #8
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- California, MD
Ditch the bra ...buy a non carcinogeous pogo stick!!!
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By homebrew in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 3Last Post: 08-13-2009, 10:45 AM
By CamaroRacing12 in forum Kawasaki Open DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 06-24-2009, 03:49 PM
By AlexD in forum Sea Doo Open DiscussionReplies: 13Last Post: 09-28-2007, 10:44 PM
By Yellow93 in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)Replies: 1Last Post: 08-24-2007, 12:35 PM
By spyder3000gtvr4 in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (4-stroke)Replies: 0Last Post: 05-18-2007, 05:17 PM