Thread: thru hull exaust
10-03-2008, 05:00 PM #1
thru hull exaust
whats the diffrence between the thru -hull exaust and the free flow and what are the advantage and disadvantages of both
10-03-2008, 05:08 PM #2
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Crest Hill, IL
FREE-FLOW utilizes the OEM exhaust outlet, and removes the resonator. Cheap upgrade for throaty sound...NOT MUCH in gain of performance unless the waterbox is modified...Its nice and loud, but the resonating sound from 2500-4000rpm is annoying...
Thru-Hull is just what is says, a thru hull exhaust requiring a hole be cut in the rear of the ski. This eliminates the resonating effect of the free-flow, and provides the same performance unless combines with a modifed waterbox, Green/Riva box, or a Gibson exhaust....
10-03-2008, 07:10 PM #3
01-19-2009, 03:06 PM #4
01-19-2009, 03:17 PM #5
Can you use the stock plastic thru hull piece instead of a metal one? Relocate it to the rear and block the factory hole?
01-19-2009, 03:21 PM #6
I took these yesterday when i finished the Free Flow install on my RxP-X. Its not as loud as I thought it would be. It's got a growl to it now, and sound 10x's better than stock.
you replace this
01-19-2009, 03:30 PM #7
01-19-2009, 03:46 PM #8
01-19-2009, 04:00 PM #9
01-19-2009, 04:44 PM #10
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By benarm in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 5Last Post: 07-17-2011, 02:33 AM
By Water4fire in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 17Last Post: 01-30-2007, 06:56 PM
By jeremy in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 0Last Post: 03-02-2006, 07:41 AM
By jeremy in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 9Last Post: 02-28-2006, 07:46 AM
By Compwhiz82 in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 21Last Post: 06-25-2005, 11:08 AM