Thread: compression vs. timing??
03-10-2009, 07:49 PM #1
compression vs. timing??
Hi guys, i'm wondering what combination will work better for top end? Would it be less timing with higher compression, more timing with less compression, or an even amount of both?? I'm currently running on my ported 1300R (NPV) 165psi compression with +3 timing. I was wondering wether to lower compression (150-155psi) combined with +4 timing or +2 timing with with 170 compression or just leave it the way it is??
03-10-2009, 10:04 PM #2
the fastest guy on the forum used to run very high compression (170)
recently there have been others to run very well with lower compression (140 ish)
with higher compression you want to reduce timing
if its me I'd leave things as they are
03-10-2009, 10:18 PM #3
03-11-2009, 07:24 AM #4
I'd like to know wutz the skinny on these cylinders? I hear #3 is the deto but #2 runs the hottest ect ect ..... I've stuck em all!!! LOL
03-11-2009, 08:23 AM #5
when you talk about compression and timing, don't forget "octane" Thats a key variable as well.
03-11-2009, 09:22 AM #6
I run this combination (+3 timing/ 165psi comp) on 93 octane and so far i haven't had any issues, but i know i'm pushing it. The reason i brought this up is cause i've always though that more timing=better take off/mid-range with less top end.. so i thought maibe someone has tried different combinations of timing/comp on the same ski with same mods and noticed any difference. i'm thinking of trying lower timing with the 165psi comp i have now and compare the results.. Or leaving the combination i have now (+3/165psi) and run higher octane. What do you guys think?
03-11-2009, 10:36 AM #7
I may be wrong, but seems like keeping what you have and running higher octane will not yield gains. It may be safer and less likely to predetonate, but the performance will be the same.
I was under a similar impression with regard to the compression v. timing thing. More advanced timing seems to give it a kick all around, but with a focus on the mid and lower ranges. Higher compression seems to also give it a boost all around, but with a focus on the high mid and high ranges.
DISCLAIMER: Once again, I have no data to back this up, just the impression that I have gotten from reading and some seat of the pants dynos in other vehicles, excluding the GPR.
03-11-2009, 11:19 AM #8
03-11-2009, 11:59 AM #9
With a 2 stroke, you eventually reach a point of diminishing returns with compression and timing...Too much timing and too much compression will hurt peak and over rev hp. High rpm two strokes like to have the timing pulled back a bit on top...it "frees" them up a little and allows you to rev them a bit further past their peak hp point, without the power falling off like a stone. I have found though, that while the engine seems happier up top with a little less timing, it can be a bit slower to hit peak rpm, and to recover that RPM after a heavy load situation (i.e. going full throttle out of a turn).
There is only one way to find out what your combination likes, and thats to test it. Different porting will change timing and compression requirements, as will exhaust back pressure (pipe design, silencer, stinger size, amount of water injected,etc). Dome design (squish width and clearance, bowl size and shape) also plays a role in what your actual combination will like.
03-11-2009, 09:29 PM #10
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By Vern in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 121Last Post: 09-04-2015, 01:48 PM
By Avi8tor in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 8Last Post: 09-24-2012, 06:37 PM
By Awesomewrangler in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)Replies: 8Last Post: 08-02-2012, 06:34 PM
By cjo632racing in forum 4-Tec PerformanceReplies: 1Last Post: 04-14-2011, 10:59 AM
By o uncola o in forum Yamaha PWC Performance (2-stroke)Replies: 2Last Post: 06-19-2009, 07:40 PM